A good laugh is always a good laugh, but even when it comes to comic things, the trends may change. If you are acquainted to the “meme” phenomenon, you know how these evolve – they grow to popularity, then reach the saturation level and slowly fade f95zone away. Also, not all humor sites manage to stay entertaining. See what’s still in the charts and gets the laughs. Here is a selection for blog junkies.
The famous The Onion has long been in the charts as one of the best humor websites. Despite of being so popular, some people are still not aware of its satire content. Thanks to its serious news format, the site happens to be mistaken as, well, a real news site. Here is how Literally Unbelievable has come up with its incredibly hilarious collection of reactions, replies and critiques to Onion posts. Being totally naïve is more common than you think.
Facebook-related jokes have soared in popularity recently. If you love to see people fail and laugh nike tech at their mistakes (many of us tend to have this guilty pleasure), check this never ending series of failed Facebook status updates. Everything is 100% genuine and it’s unbelievable what people can post out there.
The passive-aggressive attitude is all around. Since it appears to be so popular, it was high time someone used all the gems of passive-aggressiveness and gathered them in a blog. These pages will entertain you with loads of real-life situations that are just loaded with the mentioned attitude.
On Facebook, Aunty Acid has 3 million likes. The image posts are being shared insanely on social networks because they just illustrate the human species and its psychology so well GoDaddy Email login. You want to know how women think, why they act in totally senseless ways, how to deal with teens or handle all annoying situations in life? Aunty Acid will tell you in just a few words full of sarcasm and humor.
Believe it or not, this blog contains 100% real messages. “Cousin Bennett” is a real guy who has a really awkward (yet phonetically precise) spelling, along with some really crazy, shocking, silly, entertaining ideas. The blog is filled with such ridiculous and amazing bits of conversation between Bennett and his cousin. The success of the blog actually led to the publishing of a book with the same name, which is selling quite well on Amazon.
Who would imagine there are so many stereotypes out there and that weird behavior is just so common? Reading the hundreds of short posts on this blog will make you feel like the world is really small, but full of awkward and hilarious situations. This is like a social fresco. It is also cathartic in some way, since it displays many of the annoying or pointless types we face almost on a daily basis. It feels good to know you’re not alone. Also, you could do this: gather your friends and see who can relate to these posts. Most of them, no matter how unusual they sound at first, are easy to relate to.
As an author of online articles, a prolific one to say the least, I have some troubling news, something that has been bothering me lately. You see, I get my news, perhaps like you in real time, and I write articles which involve a little Op-Ed which takes into account my worldly knowledge and observations. I am also very good about quoting sources, titles of articles, other authors, writers and the publications, either real or virtual. But recently, I’ve noted that as I quote an article, the source for some reason changes the name or title of the article, but alas, I’ve already cited my source, which now has been modified.
This can diminish my credibility, but worse it confuses readers who go to check on the references to learn more, perhaps they are doing research as the topics I often write on are of an intellectual nature – how unfair to them. There was an interesting article on the “10,000 Word Blog” titled; “Everything Upworthy Can Teach Journalists,” by Karen Fratti on March 27, 2014 which better explains why more and more online sources are doing changing titles once their articles go live. The blog post noted:
“Ah, the infamous Upworthy style headline. In one part of the feature, they talk about ‘click testing,’ where they run through possible headlines and then see how clickable they are out in the wild. If it’s not clickable, they tweak. Every media outlet can do this, and if you want to garner more traffic, you should. If you feel icky about changing the headline after it’s originally published, just add a note. I see good digital outlets doing this all the time. Slate stories, for example, often have one headline when I see it in the morning and another by the afternoon when I actually get around to reading it.”
This entire scheme and strategy is just another SEO type trick to try to game the search engines, and it becomes somewhat unfair to readers, information online, and even for the archiving of information for the future. It is a serious concern and a non-trivial problem as I see it. If only one company online was doing it, so what, not a big deal, but when we see major websites do this, it causes a huge problem for everyone, especially the users, those people who rely on the Internet to give them the information they want on a timely basis. Modification of article titles isn’t the same as updating a news article as the day or weeks progress. Please consider all this and think on it.